𝐌𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞𝐝 "𝐉𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐄 𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐄 𝐎𝐔 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐄𝐍 𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐄

The argument goes that PRB " aurait très bien pu (et aurait dû) porter ces trafics d'influence et complots devant la FCC, le CCID, voir les rendre public, s'il ne fait pas confiance à ces institutions."

My reply : No Sir, you seem to have missed out something !

How do we get the "documentary evidence" to go to the police or the FCC , ...even to the public !

The Gang of Five in action :

The role of the Gang of Five or more is to control the system by placing their cronies in key positions/sectors-Police,Prison,MRA, EDB, SBM,FCC, Air Mts …𝙕𝙤𝙩 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙣 𝙫é𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙮𝙩è𝙢 𝙡𝙖 , 𝙥𝒐𝒖 𝒌𝒐𝒖𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒛𝒐𝒕 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒕𝒚 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌!

Let’s take the example of a minister who owes MRA a huge sum ; their guy at the MRA will do the necessary and we are left with a mere allegation. Same thing about the money laundering cases, they will ensure that no proper enquiry is carried out (they are having a hard time now because the man at the FSC is not one of theirs).

Take the Roches Noires case , (as if it never happened), it has been reduced to just hearsay/gossip while the some of cronies/chatwas have been duly rewarded !

𝑲𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒆𝒔𝒌𝒊 𝒆𝒏𝒏 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒊𝒓𝒆 𝒆𝒔𝒌𝒓𝒐 𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊 à 𝑴𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒔 ? ! Nou koné ena magouilles ! No due diligence of his companies had ever been carried out ! Ou pé dir zot rod "documentary evidence" ! It may take years or it may end up like " enn lot Roches Noires" !

Meanwhile the "Gang" or "Bande" will continue their dirty work !

𝙎𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒘𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒄𝒍𝒖𝒅𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒇 𝒘𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒏'𝒕 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉 𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 "𝒅𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆", 𝒘𝒆 𝒎𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒔𝒉𝒖𝒕 𝒖𝒑 !