Friday, September 12, 2025

๐๐š๐๐š’๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ


In a press interview today , the former finance minister has again made false allegations on two examples of data manipulation by the present Government.
The first relates to GDP computation. In his own words “๐™‹๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ง ๐™š๐™ญ๐™š๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™š ๐™ก’๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™™๐™š๐™จ ๐™—๐™ž๐™š๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™š๐™ง๐™ซ๐™ž๐™˜๐™š๐™จ ๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™ก๐™š๐™จ ๐™ง๐™š๐™ซ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ช๐™จ ๐™™๐™ช ๐™‚๐™ก๐™ค๐™—๐™–๐™ก ๐˜ฝ๐™ช๐™จ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™š๐™จ๐™จ. ๐™Ž๐™ช๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™š ร  ๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™š ๐™™๐™š๐™จ ๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™™๐™š ๐™ก๐™– ๐™๐™ˆ๐™„, ๐™™๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ช๐™ž๐™จ 2021, ๐™Ž๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™˜๐™จ ๐™ˆ๐™–๐™ช๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ช๐™จ ๐™– ๐™™รฉ๐™˜๐™ž๐™™รฉ ๐™™’๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ก๐™ช๐™ง๐™š ๐™ก’๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ฅ๐™ช๐™ฉ ๐™™๐™š๐™จ ๐™‚๐˜ฝ๐˜พ ๐™™๐™–๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™ก๐™š๐™จ ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™™๐™š ๐™จ๐™š๐™ง๐™ซ๐™ž๐™˜๐™š๐™จ. ๐˜พ๐™š๐™ก๐™– ๐™ง๐™š๐™ฅ๐™งรฉ๐™จ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™๐™จ27.5 ๐™ข๐™ก๐™ก๐™™๐™จ ๐™š๐™ฃ 2021, ๐™๐™จ33.9 ๐™ข๐™ก๐™ก๐™™๐™จ ๐™š๐™ฃ 2022, ๐™๐™จ44.4 ๐™ข๐™ก๐™ก๐™™๐™จ ๐™š๐™ฃ 2023, ๐™š๐™ง ๐™๐™จ46.2 ๐™ข๐™ก๐™ก๐™™๐™จ ๐™š๐™ฃ 2024. ๐™€๐™ฉ ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฉ, ๐™™’๐™ช๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™–๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™™๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™ช๐™ข๐™š, ๐™ก๐™š๐™จ ๐™–๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ช๐™ง๐™จ ๐™™๐™š ๐™˜๐™š ๐™ง๐™–๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ง๐™ฉ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™›๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ ๐™™รฉ๐™˜๐™ž๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™™๐™š ๐™ข๐™š๐™ฉ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™š ๐™™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™˜๐™š๐™ฉ๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™ง๐™š๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™™๐™š ๐™ก๐™– ๐™๐™ˆ๐™„ ๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™™’๐™–๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง ๐™ก๐™š๐™จ ๐™˜๐™๐™ž๐™›๐™›๐™ง๐™š๐™จ ๐™™๐™š๐™จ ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™™๐™š ๐™จ๐™š๐™ง๐™ซ๐™ž๐™˜๐™š๐™จ ๐™™๐™š ๐™ก๐™– ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™ค๐™™๐™ช๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™™๐™š๐™จ ๐™‚๐˜ฝ๐˜พ".
The Minister is not telling the truth. In June 22, GDP data were revised upwards by Statistics Mauritius (SM) as from 2018 by around 3 to 4%. In this exercise, activities of GBCs and services purchased by GBCs from local enterprises, such as management, accounting, auditing, legal, advertising, real estate, banking, etc., were included in exports of services. In other words, services exports of GBCs, were partly included in total exports of services. GDP, which relates to domestic activities, was thus increased by an amount of offshore services exports.
The Bank of Mauritius, which is responsible for balance of payments compilation, did not agree to revise exports of services to include GBCs, and kept classifying all GBC export income as primary and secondary income. SM therefore made its own estimation of GBC exports of services to add to total services exports and GDP, by accordingly reducing GBC primary investment income.
GBC exports of services are justifiable to a degree, but were over-estimated by SM to reach around Rs85 bn in 2023 and 2024 as from only Rs36 bn in 2021. This data rigging was meant to inflate exports of services and GDP. Investments were also artificially boosted to raise GDP above Covid- depressed levels.
As explained in the State of the Economy (SOE) document, SM and BoM agreed at end 2024, under the new Govt, on revised figures for exports of GBC services, which reflect a downward adjustment as shown below.
Contrary to what the former minister of finance is stating, GBC exports of services are indeed included in total exports of services by BoM, and in GDP by SM, but much lower than was estimated under the previous Govt, especially as from 2021. The figures mentioned by the minister are only the excluded GBC exports, i.e., the downward adjustment. He ignores the included GBC exports.
As reported in the latest IMF Report on Mauritius, an IMF mission has been studying SM’s current GDP methodology, and will soon confirm the rationale and extent of the downward adjustment made to GBC exports of services.
The second alleged example of Govt data manipulation pertains to the CSG, which the SOE document shows to be unsustainable. Pada says that : “๐™Š๐™ง, ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ซ๐™ค๐™ž๐™ง ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ก๐™š๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง ๐™ก๐™š๐™จ ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™–๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™›๐™š๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™จ ๐™จ๐™ค๐™˜๐™ž๐™–๐™ช๐™ญ ๐™ง๐™š๐™ก๐™žรฉ๐™จ ร  ๐™ก๐™– ๐˜พ๐™Ž๐™‚, ๐™ž๐™ก๐™จ ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™–๐™Ÿ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฉรฉ ๐™™๐™š๐™จ ๐™™รฉ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™š๐™จ ๐™ฆ๐™ช๐™ž ๐™ฃ๐™š ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ช๐™ซ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ รช๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ž๐™™รฉ๐™งรฉ๐™š๐™จ ๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ง ๐™˜๐™š๐™ฉ๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ซ๐™ค๐™ž๐™ง ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™›๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™š ๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ง ๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™™๐™ž๐™ง๐™š ๐™ฆ๐™ช๐™š ๐™ก๐™– ๐˜พ๐™Ž๐™‚ ๐™ฃ’๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™ฅ๐™–๐™จ ๐™ซ๐™ž๐™–๐™—๐™ก๐™š. ๐˜ผ๐™ซ๐™š๐™˜ ๐™˜๐™š๐™ฉ๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™ช๐™ก๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ, ๐™–๐™ช ๐™ก๐™ž๐™š๐™ช ๐™™’๐™–๐™ซ๐™ค๐™ž๐™ง ๐™–๐™ช 1๐™š๐™ง ๐™Ÿ๐™ช๐™ž๐™ก๐™ก๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™๐™จ 11 ๐™ข๐™ž๐™ก๐™ก๐™ž๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™จ ๐™จ๐™ช๐™ง ๐™ก๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™™๐™š ๐™ก๐™– ๐˜พ๐™Ž๐™‚, ๐™ž๐™ก๐™จ ๐™™๐™ž๐™จ๐™–๐™ž๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™ฆ๐™ช’๐™ž๐™ก ๐™ฎ ๐™–๐™ซ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™ช๐™ฃ ๐™™รฉ๐™›๐™ž๐™˜๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™™๐™š ๐™๐™จ 9 ๐™ข๐™ž๐™ก๐™ก๐™ž๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™จ”.
The ex-MOF makes a false comparison between a positive balance of Rs11 bn at the end of 24-25 to a deficit of Rs9 bn in 24-25. The alleged manipulation of Rs 11 bn relates to the inclusion in CSG payments of Govt CSG Contribution for public sector employees over five years since 2020/21.
Even if this item is not added to CSG expenses, CSG payments of Rs 19 bn exceed CSG receipts of Rs 13 bn by Rs6 bn in 24-25. Hence the SOE statement that the CSG has become unsustainable and is putting extreme pressure on public finances remains valid.
Govt used CSG receipts to finance CSG expenses as from 2022/23. In the first two years, namely 2020/21 and 2021/22, CSG receipts were used to finance other budgetary expenses. And now, CSG receipts cannot even finance CSG social benefits.
In conclusion, our Pada deserves an Oscar for his acting performance – from fiddler of GDP and budget revenue to making baseless claims of data manipulation by others.
What a conman !!! The minister is responsible for two Moody’s sovereign credit downgrades from Baa1 to Baa3, or to the brink of junk status. And he now warns about a possible further downgrade, while criticizing the very fiscal measures that can save us from falling into junk status.
He is a calamity this GUY, how can our Press tolerate him!
Author
Rattan Chand
Sending a copy to Le Dรจfi
Paul Lismore
Rattan Chand , pointless. The post and comments have words of two or more syllables et bann pov diab la pa pou konpran....๐Ÿคช
Paul Lismore
The question that people need to ask themselves:
Why is ledefi Minus, which has the temerity to call itself an independent newspaper, giving so much space to politicians who were stuffed at the last elections?
We know that le defi was born from the entrails ofla kwizine, mais quand meme!
Do we still have an "Independent" Broadcasting Authority? Has Ramgoolam left the same idiots in charge of that moribund organisation that did absolutely nothing when la kwizine controlled the MBC, and most of our papers?
Every week, it is either Padaleksi, Joe Lesjongard, or some so called observateur politique who is nothing but an apologist for la kwizine. 
When are we going to have the lovely Ayatollah Soodhun to tell us about world politics?
People still watch the 2 hour so called interview where at any moment one expect the "interviewer" to ask a really difficult and pertinent question like: ou prefer gato piman rond ou gato piman plate aven ene trou o milieu?
Really, the word "Independent" ought to be made a criminal offence when used in relation to anything that passes for our press and media...๐Ÿ™ƒ
Rigg Needroo
Pada’s grandstanding in the media is a masterclass in deflection. It's a shocking display of audacity from a former minister who presided over two sovereign credit downgrades and now warns of another, all while criticizing the very fiscal measures designed to prevent it. His actions have demonstrated a consistent disregard for accurate data and a willingness to manipulate public perception for political gain. The press must hold him accountable for these baseless claims.