We are gradually recovering, more
robustly than expected, from the triple trade shocks or the terms of trade
shocks that dipped the national income by around 4-5% cumulatively since 2003. After a reasonable economic performance of a real
GDP growth rate of 5 % in 2006, the country is looking forward to another year
of growth of about 5.3 % powered mostly by the EPZ (6%) and the tourism sectors
(7.5%).
The main macroeconomic parameters are showing marked improvements, namely - the investment rate , inclusive of work in progress, peaking at 26.5 %, FDI inflows reaching a high of 4.7 % of GDP, a double-digit goods export growth ,one of the highest since 2001, higher labour productivity growth, a lower budget deficit and debt ratio of 4.3 % and 55% of GDP respectively. Building on some the earlier measures and policies and supported by a comprehensive reform program structured around these four pillars - Fiscal Consolidation and Improved Public Sector efficiency, Improving the Investment Climate, Improving trade competitiveness, and Democratising the Economy through participation, social inclusion and sustainability- the economy is poised to realize a new phase of growth of around 5-6 % in the medium term and move to a still higher plateau of growth in the long term. Should we already be talking about a new phase in the economic cycle - of higher growth, of booms ?
The main macroeconomic parameters are showing marked improvements, namely - the investment rate , inclusive of work in progress, peaking at 26.5 %, FDI inflows reaching a high of 4.7 % of GDP, a double-digit goods export growth ,one of the highest since 2001, higher labour productivity growth, a lower budget deficit and debt ratio of 4.3 % and 55% of GDP respectively. Building on some the earlier measures and policies and supported by a comprehensive reform program structured around these four pillars - Fiscal Consolidation and Improved Public Sector efficiency, Improving the Investment Climate, Improving trade competitiveness, and Democratising the Economy through participation, social inclusion and sustainability- the economy is poised to realize a new phase of growth of around 5-6 % in the medium term and move to a still higher plateau of growth in the long term. Should we already be talking about a new phase in the economic cycle - of higher growth, of booms ?
In today’s integrated global economy, the
international propagation of economic cycles or global trade swings and
exogenous shocks is much faster and they will invariably impinge on our economy
which was till recently still well-cocooned and where the economic
agents had yet to learn all the tricks of competitive trade and business
practices. And in
between those bright spots that have caused some to raise early cheers, a persistent patchy but advancing blizzard of
negative indicators is marring the economic scene- A high current account
deficit of around 10 % of GDP, a savings rate of below 17% , 52,000 unemployed or a historically high
unemployment rate of 9.3 % and an inflation rate of 10.7 % that leaves us
with the difficult policy choice of
trying to shake off inflationary
pressures and entrenched inflation expectations without
stealing momentum from the recovery.
Growth will have to be more
broad-based to achieve those desired above-avearge rates and the continuing over
reliance on few traditional pillars -
like tourism and textiles – leaves us still vulnerable to current changes in
the world trade regime and to exogenous shocks. The local tourist sector has
been swept by the exponential growth in international tourism. With world
growth of tourist arrivals expected at almost 6.3 % for 2007, it would be the
fourth consecutive year of growth above the long-term average. Many regions have witnessed an explosion in
tourist arrivals. - South Africa realising 13.% in 2006, Malaysia 7% , Italy
12.4 %, Africa 9.8% and Sub-Saharan Africa 11.2 %. Much of this is due to the continuing
world prosperity, the rapidly growing numbers of Chinese and Indian tourists,
the expansion of low- cost airlines services around the world, including the
emergence of long-haul low cost airlines making it increasingly accessible to a
constantly rising share of the world’s population. Make hay while the sun
shines!!! How long will it last given the new wave of protectionism and wild
market swings in oil and asset prices? Stock
values have fallen sharply in the United States and around the world and an economic downturn appears to have
supplanted inflation as the Fed's greatest worry.
In the textile sector, it seems that we have
benefited from fortuitous circumstances. In June 2005, the EU and China agreed to
quotas on imports of 10 categories of clothing lasting until 2008. These are:
pullovers, men's trousers, blouses, T-shirts, dresses, bras, flax yarn, cotton
fabrics, bed linen, table and kitchen linen. Under the agreement, growth in
these exports is limited to 8-12.5% per year in 2005, 2006 and 2007. The quota fill rates remaining at low levels
in 2006. Fear of new embargoes disappeared and much larger orders were received
by Chinese exporters. As a result, EU's imports began rising sharply by the end
of last year. Quota fill rates finally exceeded 80% by the end of 2006 in no
less than six categories, including pullovers (5), women/girls shirts (7), or
women/girls dresses (26). Statistics covering the use of licences in China confirm
that EU's quotas were nearly filled by the end of the year in categories 5
(pullovers), 6 (trousers), 7 (W/G shirts) and 115 (flax yarns). Reflecting the larger
demand, quota prices were significantly higher by the end of 2006. As long as the quotas against China were
underutilised, it was not to our advantage. But once the quotas were filled and
prices increasing, importers started tapping their traditional reliable sources
reputed for their quality and quick response for product delivery and thus our
textile sector received a salutary boost. And more so in 2007 as Chinese
products face the new 'green wall' of
EU: REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals) law .
So we cannot ascertain that the recovery will not be dented by unexpected
shocks . No, not yet; we have to be
cautiously optimistic about the future economic direction, much more needs to
be done, and much more needs to be achieved, before we can say that the economy
has really taken off. We have focussed most of the radical reform effort on short
term macro-stabilization that have redressed to some extent the economic
situation and brought back the economy on track. But that will not be enough for
establishing a solid base for sustained economic growth and get the economy going again at full blast ; To
anchor the growth dynamics in more solid stuff, now the medium to long term
strategies and measures have to fall in line. In each of the pillars of the
reform programme, the short-term measures that are being implemented will have
to be supported by appropriate sector strategies. The Chairman of the Steering
Committee on the Empowerment programme did hit the mark when he referred to the
programme as a palliative, for it had to transcend short-termism and be
supplemented by appropriate reforms in the education sector. Allow me to share
some views on the need for flexibilty and a learning environment that equips us
with the necessary tools to be meaningful contributors to the development of
our country. Even Lee Kwan Yew
acknowledged that they have been somewhat off-track on the education system;
Singapore has claimed that its economic success was built on the high quality
of its bureaucrats with the brightest of each generation encouraged to join the
civil service; this tradition seems to have sapped Singaporean’s appetite for
risk-taking; - too much concentration on rote-learning without enough of emphasis
on innovation and creativity. The result is that Singapore lacks a class of
entrepreneurs who want to start their own small, and medium sized businesses- like most education
systems they have yet to transform the exam- oriented system to a
quality-oriented one and stop turning
out morons, mere multiple-degree holders and bureaucrats, that are mere “bags of wind”; The biggest weakness in
Singapore’s education system is that it overlooks non-academically tuned kids
who would make good entrepreneurs; some top schools and universities recently
acknowledged that they would reduce the importance of results in selecting
applicants and apply greater weight to activities such as application of
knowledge, problems-solving skills, sports and the arts. Is it too odd to think
in this way in the present prevailing mood of certainties, be it on elitism,
poverty, ZEP, identity, language or you
name it ?
We will need to
take up such similar issues ( like Tianli , the energy gamble, the sugar
strategy) ,another time, in our elaboration of the different strategies within
the overall conceptual framework or vision ( the four pillars of the reform
programme) that provides the direction, consistency, and focus essential to
sustain any long-term process of growth or boom.