It is so aberrant that some of the stewards and opinion leaders of our economy have grown so gullible, refusing to wake up from the torpor into which they have been
lulled in as the new
formidable cohort of followers and cheerleaders. It is much
easier to bend to the wind, to join the bandwagon than to take a hard look at the facts and
filter out the frivolous statements, the incendiary rhetoric and its
inadequacies. Leadership or management
or any such position of responsibility is supposed to be about more than
cheering your team, humbling and jeering the
other side- the dissenting side- that has freed itself from that horrible urge to always fit in and now
dares to think differently.
It’s supposed to be about changing the country for the better.
Hedging: We
gulped it all down-lock, stock and barrel- that the unfortunate hedging losses
explain the present predicament of our Paille en Queue. That’s absurd. Air Mauritius was
not competitive enough to bear the drastic move from a near monopoly situation
to a more competitive one. Air Mauritius was already feeling the deleterious effects
of the liberalisation of air access before being hit by the hedging losses, yet
another one of those inadmissible blunders that was amassing into such a whole heap
of mismanagement that it was inevitable that it would soon burst out in the
open spilling all over the place sparing very few. It is not the hedging losses which is the
issue, it is the strikingly inept management of the company that has been
allowed to carry on unchecked for years. The other side do not want to settle for half-baked solutions. For the
small fries and for much less than the Rs 6 billion (that may peak up to Rs 9
billion) they are being told to lev pake
alle while the CEO and the Board
of Air Mts, shamelessly, stay put.
And at the STC
they seem to be on another planet; teleconferencing with Morgan Stanley,
negotiating with Mangalore Petroleum, the Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing
Federation (Amul) and the Chinese Authorities (wheat) and even allowing
themselves the luxury of exploring the possibility of indulging in diamond
trading on the sides that will help to cross-subsidise our wheat and gas
consumption. And at the end of the day the outcome is not much different from
that of Air Mauritius
– huge financial gaps- but with the difference that the STC
covertly passes it on to the consumers who are there to carry their burden of
incompetence. Meanwhile they stay put – the risk committee, the Chairman, Advisers,
Managers, petit copains et al. MK in
the inspiring piece titled “Fault lines”,
in this paper’s last week edition, addresses this issue with such comprehensive
authority when he notes that “ our institutions suffer from the gaffes
that are made by certain privileged people who believe that, no matter what
they do, they will get away unscathed. Would it have been possible to run those
institutions with aggressive and independent-minded professionals? We believe
so.”
So does the other side. These
guys should go and proven-professionals should replace the whole bunch of amateurs
squatting at Air Mts and STC . “Unfortunately, no new government will
take the initiative to drive in this direction because each one has to gratify
its so-called supporters. “
On the other
side there are also some who have some doubts about the now generally
accepted view that the amateurs of the risk committees were somewhat unlucky on
hedging -that it was all through a one way-bet and that the only way that the
price of petroleum could go was up. The dissenters may now appear to be wiser
after the event. But they were among the few that did not conform to the widely
held view that the price of petroleum will soar to US$ 200 –an assumption that
became an edict. The few had, at the beginning of last year, warned that “ it will rather through the financial markets that most of
the tremors will be felt by triggering a rise in risk premiums, a drying up of
market liquidity and crashing share prices- equity and commodity prices
including petroleum.” And the ex- Governor, Mr Basant Roi, of the Central Bank reminds us today that “there was a clear indication that the
price of oil was about to decline. A little more than six months ago Mexico sold oil
in the futures market at US$70 when the prevailing price was US$130. A turning
point in the price of oil was around the corner. This turning point was
confirmed when, quite a few months ago, Saudi Arabia decided on its
national budget…...
Several of the oil-exporting countries had their respective budgets based on
a pegged price for oil that was far below US$100.”
Extension of class hours : It
is so absurd that the extension of school hours for a mere 30 minutes has
suddenly become the revolutionary move
of the day that will transform our schools
and colleges from institutions that emphasize rote memorization to ones that
teach practical applications and instil
creativity. The other side is concerned that such a minor graft
onto the overly competitive and elitist system is being brought upfront
futilely canalising energies when other more important issues like deteriorating
quality standards and discipline are being grossly ignored. It is surprising that such a dysfunctional
system is being allowed to continue perpetuating inequalities in opportunity
and producing misfits when they get out into the real world. Indeed, this education
system is turning out to be very costly in terms of wastage of our main asset-
human capital.
Food security: It is inadmissible that our grandiose
food security strategy has not been properly costed the different options and
provided for an appropriate support scheme that induces farmers to improve the
production of risky crops such as potato and onion and thus allow us to beat
the market and better face the food crisis. The other side is querying whether we are not committing the same
blunders as in the case of the Gros-Bois potato project, one of the exhibits
during the recent visit of Marianne Fischer Boël, European Commisioner for
Agriculture. Selon un planteur,
" gouverman finn perdi boukou kas
dan sa proze la’.
Two
million tourists in 2015 : It’s so depressing to acknowledge
that the persistence of the authorities has paid off and the controversial 2
million tourists by 2005 target has gradually seeped into some knowledgeable
quarters who think it is more profitable to dance to the tune of the piper than to display any dissenting dissonance. On
the other side, we had first of all our environment specialist and
crusader, Nicholas Rainer, who believes that we have two millions reasons to
fret before we tune in to the 2 million tourists target-“ Two million tourists would be suicidal for Mauritius ’s
environmental and social balance. Politicians and common sense are odd
bedfellows indeed.” And more recently another of our committed environmentalist,
Assoc. Prof Ramesh Durbarry of the UTM reminds us loud and clear that
the: " Deux millions de touristes en 2015 : nous ne sommes pas prêts ! ….. N'oublions pas d'autre part l'impact de 2
millions de touristes sur la nature : l'augmentation de la pollution de l'air
et celle de la pollution sonore à cause d'une trop grande circulation routière,
l'utilisation d'un espace de plus en plus restreint, la contamination de nos
ressources en eau, la perte croissante de notre biodiversité. La pression va
augmenter sur notre réseau routier, sur nos infrastructures portuaires et
aéroportuaires. »
Do we have a strategy for the sector that incorporates
all these elements ?
What
is our strategy now that the growth rate of the sector has plummeted from 14% to
a mere 2.6% ? We will need more from the MTPA than the
traditional “ gardant la qualité et la proximite de coeur” strategy . Otherwise
lev pake alle and leave it to
the professionals.
The Integrated Resort Scheme (IRS ): It
is pathetic that some knowledgeable analysts just do not give up on the IRS issue; they scoured the SIDS- Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai and even Reunion
island -to find out some valid arguments that could justify the IRS ; some of their recent findings are indeed
bewildering : “The more foreigners
living in Mauritius, the more it will help the small and medium enterprises and
the masses.” And this gem –“What
does Mauritius
has as options ? No one owes us a living …” so let us leverage our property
market to the Beckhams and Baachaans and wait for them , once in every two
years when they choose to occupy their Mauritian villa, to spend their prized
US dollars on our Made in Mauritius products.
The other side is prompt to argue that the issue is not about
xenophobia or any other phobia, it just a question of the opportunity cost of using
such prime land-for e.g hosting on the present IRS
sites institutions of higher learning of international standards will bring in
addition substantial external economies
to the economy. Among the dissenting ones, Percy Mistry, prefers “ the kind of land development in a fully
opened up land market, along with an appropriate tax basis for converting
agricultural land into ‘developable’ land ….. Those options would be much
better and far more equitable than the IRS
and RES ” that do
not extend our production frontier, that is, boost future production of either
goods or services.
Our man from Harvard
Our dear cohort , always free for free lectures, were
all there in the front seats avidly imbibing those glimpses of insights – on the recession facing many
economies with the only exception being our miracle island, inflation targeting
and reforms- but the appeal of the
lectures failed to transcend the
charisma of the messenger. And Nita who often finds herself on the other
side, in her habitual caustic way, had a dig at our vaunted think thanks “ just
because somebody from Harvard who uttered such nonsense, it never occurred to
anyone….that someone from Harvard could be wrong.”
With due
acknowledgement to MK, he left me with no choice but to uplift his concluding
paragraph which is so contextual that it fits in effortlessly, corners and all,
without any aberration, and adds value to this article that has dared to dwell
on the fault lines, that is, on “certain public servants who assume a
posturing so as to project themselves as being close to the new centre of power
each time there is a change of government. The necessary lack of character
behind such posturing has opened the way for the less technical of our public
servants to reach the top. Having reached this position, they perpetuate
themselves by targeting their more efficient colleagues. Decades of this
practice have saddled the public institutions with mediocrity. It is not
surprising therefore that our public service is not as incisive and
result-driven as it could have been. It has become prone to blunders and
incapable of innovation to face the challenges of the modern world.” But probing our institutions’ fault lines can be
hazardous.