Tuesday, May 5, 1998

Theme: Competitiveness

 Over the last three decades, Mauritius has successfully transformed its monocrop sugar economy to a diversified one and achieved sustained growth.  The three main growth sectors have been sugar, manufacturing textiles and tourism.  The development of the services sector(namely freeport and offshore banking activities) is expected to stimulate growth in the future.

It was through government policy initiated in the 1970’s, that the export base was expanded by the creation of the Export Processing Zone, which absorbed the available supply of cheap labour and increased export earnings.  Favourable fiscal concessions and the preferential access to Europe under the Lome convention encouraged foreign direct investment in the EPZ. Two major devaluations in 1979 and 1981, under the IMF Structural Adjustment Programme enhanced export competitiveness.  To further enhance competitiveness of the Mauritian EPZ, the rupee was delinked from the SDR and pegged to a basket of currencies. Since 1983, a flexible exchange rate policy was pursued to depreciate the rupee gradually, which was particularly favourable to the expansion of the EPZ

The successful pursuit of these policies greatly promoted the competitiveness of our EPZ exports and, supported by favourable world economic conditions, set the stage for higher sustained growth of the EPZ sector.  EPZ growth averaged 21% for the period 1983-1989 with a peak 34.9% in 1986.

 However, in the 1990’s, growth of EPZ registered a downturn with a significantly lower average growth rate of 5.9% due to factors both on the local and international scene.  On the local scene, soaring unit labour cost is rapidly eroding competitiveness (unit labour cost has been rising at an average 7% per year for the period 1986-1996).  The loss in competitive edge of Mauritian products due to such domestic cost increases in competitiveness is accentuated by major development on the international scene in the post GATT era. Globalisation of world markets with the prospect of greater competition from low cost producers and likely reduced preferences under Lome Convention are now challenges to our export competitiveness.

A profound diagnostic of the Mauritian economy by Sanjaya Lall and Ganesha Wignaraja[1] (1997 ) reveals the following inherent weakness of our export stategy.

·       The Mauritian competitive advantage evolved around a pool of cheap labour force and capital accumulation while taking advantage of preferential accesses on the European market.  Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth was much less important (0.45% for the period 1982-1996 whereas in some East Asian Economies like Japan, Korea, China, Hong-Kong, Thailand and Taiwan, TFP growth accounts for 33% of growth on average)

·       Concentration of our EPZ manufacturing into virtually one product – clothing ( 80% of manufactured exports ).  This renders Mauritius extremely vulnerable to unfavourable development in the world clothing market.

·       Concentration of manufactured exports into low skill, labour intensive exports. Besides, industry research and development is nearly inexistent in Mauritius The excessive dependence of Mauritius on low-skill labour intensive exports and absence of proper research and development on the part of industry defies the strategy designed to sharpen our international competitiveness edge in this new trading environment.  Such a strategy involves moving up market into higher quality products to avoid competition with low wage countries in the lower end market.

·       Over dependence of EPZ exports into a few markets mainly European – over 70% of our EPZ exports are concentrated in European markets which renders us vulnerable to the vagaries of their economic policies and performance.

·     The Mauritian EPZ fails to develop forward and backward linkages.  Forward linkages - further processing of EPZ products are difficult as EPZ firms are legally required to produce for the export market.  Similarly as firms import most of their supplies of raw materials and intermediate products, backward linkages on large scale are very difficult


Faced with the above weaknesses, Mauritius need to reassess its competitive advantage.  The country seems to have reached a plateau in how far it can go with its existing endowments, and needs to alter the underlying structure.  Therefore the goal of its export strategy will be to strengthen market share for products that already have a competitive advantage in the world markets and diversify export structure to develop new competitiveness in other manufacturing products as well as in other sectors like services.

Three distinct steps are envisaged to sharpen the competitive edge of Mauritian products and services, namely:

A.    Setting up the appropriate institutional framework
B.    Setting  the right policy-mix
C.    Instilling a change in attitudes

A.    Institutional framework

      The institutional framework emphasises on the direct involvement of all the stakeplayers of the economy, including the employers and the trade unions in the competitiveness programme.  The success of such a programme rests on the shared responsibility between the public and private sector .

·       The government is actively promoting the growth of a dynamic private sector through a more business friendly environment by fine-tuning the legal and regulatory framework to respond effectively to the needs of the private sector. Private sector consultations on major national issues like competitiveness is a priority agenda item. The government will continue to provide institutional support and fiscal incentives to promote and develop private sector enterprises. 

·       An apex body like the National Productivity Council which ensures a holistic approach by englobing different institutions like the MRC, MEDIA, MSB, etc. will be set up to advise government on the appropriate benchmark to monitor the productivity, efficiency, flexibility of industry.  It will also help to formulate new policies and advise on choices of activities to be promoted for future competitiveness.


B. Setting the right Policy-Mix


1.      Macroeconomic policies.

Redefined foreign exchange policy remains a means to enhance international competitiveness.  Mauritius has in the past been using exchange rate policy to promote export competitiveness. A more realistic exchange rate policy reflecting economic fundamentals will ensure greater investors’ confidence in the economy.  There is thus a need for a reassessment of the use of exchange rate policy shifting emphasis to achieving cost competitiveness from a supply side point of view, that is improving total factor productivity while controlling the rate of inflation

2.     Industrial Policy

·       Promotion of SME’s which are relatively efficient, easy to establish and very flexible.  SME’s contribute to 20% of GDP and 35% of total employment.
·       Promotion of forward and backward linkages.  Creation of industrial districts where around large firms, clusters of smaller ones cater for the special needs of large firms to improve flexibility and quality of the latter.  This will also enable pooling of skills, knowledge while encouraging exchange of ideas and long term co-operation among entrepreneurs.

3.  Trade Policies.

Mauritius is a very open economy, with trade accounting for around 120% of our GDP and ranking first in Africa's openness to trade index.  There is a link between outward orientation and gains in productivity. In the wake of the post GATT environment, government is pursuing with trade liberalisation. Trade policies will involve

·       Meeting targets for reductions in import tariffs so as to achieve a uniform level of effective protection until such protection is completely eradicated.  In the long run, this will ensure more competition and hence more efficiency among firms.

·       Enhancing the role of the MEDIA for export promotion.

·       Enhancing marketing abilities of private business associations and attracting multinational co-operations to set up business in Mauritius, which will bring instill more sophisticated technologies.


4.  Diversification of  export structure

(a).  Manufacturing

·       Incentives are given to industrialists to diversify to new range of products like electronics, leather, printing, and publishing, etc. where the best prospect for future expansion lies.
·       Upgrade quality of exports, which will enable us to move up-market by producing more skill and technology intensive products.
·       Diversify the export markets by shifting emphasis from Europe to neighbouring countries in the context of regional co-operation
·       Possibility for delocalisation of low-end tasks to other countries within the region, where labour may be cheaper.


(b).  Fourth Pillar of Growth – Quaternary Sector

Future growth also lies in diversifying the economy and increasing the share of the services sector.  Mauritius is aiming at developing into a high-tech and knowledge-based economy.  New sources of growth will be towards:

·       Specialising into high tech information technology like Computer Aided Design, Software Services, Publishing and Voice Operations.  However, we face an enormous task to compete with countries with established software exports like India and Phillipines.  Yet with regional co-operation, we can make a move towards exporting our services to countries within the region to start with. 

·       Maintaining competitiveness in offshore financial services.  Here, our competitiveness is enhanced by the presence of a stable political climate, a proper regulatory framework and tax advantages conferred by various double taxation agreements.  With globalisation and intense competition, however, these traditional advantages will not be sufficient to ensure future success.  We need a more aggressive approach to tap new offshore businesses.  One way would be to take advantage of the grouping of nations under regional co-operation, viewing other countries in the region as potential markets. It will be more feasible for us to compete within a region first and then compete internationally once we have gathered the required market intelligence, than to face global competition at the initial stage.

·       The  other promising area of service exports is consultancy in the African region. Many of these service exports can be based on the Mauritian experience of export-led growth, in which it has over the neighbouring countries. Since most other African countries are liberalising their economies and seeking to promote export-oriented manufacturing and service operations, they will seek expertise from other countries that have successfully managed the process.  Mauritius is one of these countries with a significant advantage in its bilingual capabilities.  It may also be able to exploit its membership of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to develop marketing opportunities for consultancy services.

5.  Policies towards Skills and Technology development

Diversification and technological upgrading cannot be pursued without an appropriate human resource development programme and policies to favour technological development and its efficient adoption.

i.               Human Resources Development.

·       To ensure that a shortage of skills does not slacken the growth momentum, the government is reviewing its human resource development strategy. Priorities are concentrated at raising the share of technicians, engineers and professionals for the benefit of both existing industries and upcoming future growth industries.  Apart from university training in information technology, engineering, and consultancy to meet the needs for future sectors, the strategy also concentrates on industry led training provided by the IVTB to cater for the special needs of existing industries.

·       Skill needs and provision will be monitored and prioritised on a continuous basis, with effective interaction  between employers and training institutions.  Skill needs will also be assessed by continuous monitoring of international competitors . 

·       Particular attention should be paid to the SME’s by special information and incentive programmes to recruit better trained  labour and to invest in formal training. Their method of skill transmission tends to be confined to the apprenticeship system, where craftsmen teach young workers, largely with little formal education, traditional methods that have been used over time without much change. Government will assist by providing subsidies to SME’s to invest in training and setting up activity specific training centres.

ii.         Policies towards technology.

·     The creation of a separate institution for Research and Development, namely the Mauritius Research Council. The Government would encourage the share of industry in R&D possibly through tax incentives and other business policies.  An appropriate campaign may be launched to create a stronger research culture among larger firms aiming at raising the consciousness of the benefits of in-house design and development activity. The government can also aim at increasing linkages between large firms and technology support institutions.

·     Undertake policies towards diffusion of technology to SME’s – our manufacturing industry is characterised by a few large technologically advanced firms and many very technologically backward SME’s. It is also possible for government to set up “Technology Transfer Centres”. This would help SMEs in defining their technological needs and problems (by technology audits),  providing them with relevant information on sources  technology, helping them with training, and testing, equipment repair and maintenance, and generally raising awareness of technological activity. Such centres could take over several of the functions of SMIDO or be combined with it.

·     Promoting FDI as an important source of new technology.  As the factors behind the initial massive FDI flows in the EPZ (i.e. the presence of cheap, literate labour, reasonable labour productivity and industrial discipline, preferential and business environment) have been significantly eroded, FDI has to be attracted by some other means.  Apart from emphasising on a stable macro economic environment other policies to stimulate FDI are being envisaged

·     Transforming of MEDIA, which currently undertakes investment as well as trade promotion and industrial estate management, into a specialised trade promotion organisation, with its management and development of industrial estates hived off to the private sector.

·     Establishment of a ‘ New  Specialised Agency’ for foreign investment promotion. The new agency will place considerable emphasis on targetting selected activities and investors. One key element in the new approach will be a regional head quarters (RHQ) programme to attract leading MNCs to set up bases for the African region

·     the approval process must be greatly simplified and streamlined, reducing the number of  stages in the approval process to one, centering on one Foreign Investment Approval committee.

           
6.  Refocusing Role of the state

·       Rethinking of the government as a regulatory body and a provider of infrastructure.  Market forces and the private sector should predominate in investment and production.  Private sector contribution to total investment has now reached 80%.  Privatisation of government business through sale to strategic partners is expected to bring in new technology (Mauritius Telecoms)

·        The BOT scheme is expected to unleash private initiatives.

·       Rethinking the welfare estate to improve efficiency of government expenditure.  There is the need to review some social services like pensions, social security, education, housing and health and to provide some of these services on an ‘ability to pay’ basis.

C.  A change in attitudes

There need to be a change in attitudes on the part of every stakeplayer and economic agent.  New work ethics has to be inculcated.  Political stability, sound legal and regulatory framework and absence of corruption are ideals to be pursued to ensure social harmony and sustained socio-economic development.







[1] Lall S. and Wignaraja G; “ Mauritius: Dynamising Export Competitiveness”, Report for the Ministry of Finance, Government of Mauritius, June, 1997.